Saturday, November 14, 2015

Ethical Images and Where to Find Them

Have you ever been annoyed with copyright? Maybe you've been doing an assignment for school and have to scour the depths of a source to find the proper procedure for using a picture or a quote. Or maybe you worked tirelessly to post a creative and funny video on YouTube only to have it ripped down thanks to a company or business who feels like you violated their copyright. 

Wouldn't life be easier if we could all just use whatever academic or creative work we wanted when we wanted it? Actually no, that would be awful.

Copyright exists for a reason. It protects the authors intellectual property. Without this, authors would have a very hard time making a living off there work. It would be like cooking dinner every night only to have complete strangers barge into your house and eat all your food.

Regardless, Copyright isn't going anywhere so we'd better learn to deal with it. But fret not, Copyright laws are fair and there are plenty of ways to use many different classes of work without stepping on any toes. What I'm talking about is, of course, Creative Commons.

 As their website states,"Creative Commons is a nonprofit organization that enables the sharing and use of creativity and knowledge through free legal tools." by using creative commons and other similar search engines you can find a smorgasbord of free images, music, and videos that have very limited copyright restrictions. The only catch is you generally have to mention who the original author is.

For example, check out the following images I found on Google Images using Creative Commons. These are all images I plan to use later for a project.



When determining whether or not you can use a work it's best to ask yourself four questions.
  1. Why are you using it?
  2. What is the nature of it? Is it a fact or an idea or more of a creative piece. 
  3. How much of it do you plan to use?
  4. Will you harm the potential market for the author?  
When I used Google images, I filtered for images release to the public for "noncommercial reuse." This mean's that I am permitted to use these images as is as long I do not intend to make any money off of them. Given that all the above images will be placed into this private blog, which will likely not circulate outside of my classroom, and later be modified for use in a slidecast, I am in no way violating copyright. Besides the fact that I am using them for educational purposes, which warrants a certain amount of fair use to begin with, all these images were listed in creative commons as available for reuse.

Hopefully you found some of this information helpful. Thanks for reading!

Sunday, November 8, 2015

Fill your powerpoints with CRAP


Powerpoints. 


If you're like me, you've been making them since middle school, but what if I told you that you've likely been doing them wrong for years. Most powerpoints, or slidecasts as their often called, throw visual design principles out the window. They are loaded down with redundant bullet points and are nearly impossible to read without someone narrating along with it. 

Slidecasts to be truly effective should be able to be read comprehensibly without a presenter; summarizing only the most important details the author wants to get across to his audience. In general, It would be wise to remember these key points:
  • Each slide should use only one point, or main idea.
  • Text should be used only for emphasis.
  • Any images should serve a rhetorical purpose and be relevant and engaging; avoid clip art.
  • Put CRAP in your slidecast!
Set off by that last point? Don't be, CRAP is an acronym for general principles of visual design. It is all about visual contrast, repetition, alignment, and proximity. I could tell you what this looks like, but it would be easier to show you. 

If you click the following link you'll be taken to a slidecast by Mark Johnstone on creative adverting, in which Mark makes use of all the above pricnples. 

http://www.slideshare.net/MarkJohnstone2/how-toproducebettercontentideasmarkjohnstone?ref=http://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/inspiring-slideshare-presentations-for-marketers-list

For starters, notice the CRAP layout (the good kind of CRAP). The entire presentation tends to be in black and white or a shade of gray, which shows a clear contrast between the text and background. The font he uses is an all lowercase, simple typewriter-esque serif font. These same basic feautres repeat throughout his document. Everything on his slides, his type, images, graphs, are in a center alignment. When called for, the individual pieces follow a logical order, with text on the top and bottom of each slide and an image in the middle, thus creating proximity.

Everything has a purpose. Individually, the black and white color scheme, pain typeface and center alignment are typically seen as over simple tools of design that many creating a slidecast would seek to avoid. However, Mark takes these individual facets and uses them to create a slidecast that is interesting and appealing to his audience.

Visual designs aside, mark also makes use of other points as well. He has only one main idea on each slide, his text is only ever used for emphasis, and when he does use images, they are to illustrate his point more clearly to the viewer. Above all, the presentation is entirely comprehensive without mark having to lecture us.  I don't know about y'all, but I could think of a few lecture-heavy professors who could take some design tips from Mark.



**Addendum**

To experiment with CRAP myself (pun not intended). I created a single slidecast from some research I used in one of my previous school projects, a white paper on how nonprofits use social media.


Both the text and image are aligned to the center. The color of the text and background are in contrast with one another, with the background being a very pale blue. The background also matches with the blue in the image. Lastly, all aspects of this design repeat and are in close proximity with each other. I use the same fonts and colors to portray a crisp presentation. It's by no means perfect, but I would definitely consider it a start. 

**fair use edit** to my my knowledge, the image I used in no way violates copyright. While it is an image used by an academic party to explain better a piece of an academic research,  citing the author bellow should be enough to register my use of it for noncommercial educational purposes. I came to this conclusion by working through the 4 legal factors  of copyright. 
Firstly, my use for the above image is for educational purposes only. I in no way profit financially for using this image. Secondly, while I use creative aspects to get my point across, it is still a piece of a fact based slidecast Third, I used far less of the original work then the typically accepted "10%" of legal use. Lastly, There is no way for me to harm the market or competition of the authors. Given that this pot liekly wont see the outside of this classroom, there is no danger of encroaching on possible profits of the author.




Saturday, October 24, 2015

Fill your powerpoints with CRAP


Powerpoints. 


If you're like me, you've been making them since middle school, but what if I told you that you've likely been doing them wrong for years. Most powerpoints, or slidecasts as their often called, throw visual design principles out the window. They are loaded down with redundant bullet points and are nearly impossible to read without someone narrating along with it. 

Slidecasts to be truly effective should be able to be read comprehensibly without a presenter; summarizing only the most important details the author wants to get across to his audience. In general, It would be wise to remember these key points:
  • Each slide should use only one point, or main idea.
  • Text should be used only for emphasis.
  • Any images should serve a rhetorical purpose and be relevant and engaging; avoid clip art.
  • Put CRAP in your slidecast!
Set off by that last point? Don't be, CRAP is an acronym for general principles of visual design. It is all about visual contrast, repetition, alignment, and proximity. I could tell you what this looks like, but it would be easier to show you. 

If you click the following link you'll be taken to a slidecast by Mark Johnstone on creative adverting, in which Mark makes use of all the above pricnples. 

http://www.slideshare.net/MarkJohnstone2/how-toproducebettercontentideasmarkjohnstone?ref=http://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/inspiring-slideshare-presentations-for-marketers-list

For starters, notice the CRAP layout (the good kind of CRAP). The entire presentation tends to be in black and white or a shade of gray, which shows a clear contrast between the text and background. The font he uses is an all lowercase, simple typewriter-esque serif font. These same basic feautres repeat throughout his document. Everything on his slides, his type, images, graphs, are in a center alignment. When called for, the individual pieces follow a logical order, with text on the top and bottom of each slide and an image in the middle, thus creating proximity.

Everything has a purpose. Individually, the black and white color scheme, pain typeface and center alignment are typically seen as over simple tools of design that many creating a slidecast would seek to avoid. However, Mark takes these individual facets and uses them to create a slidecast that is interesting and appealing to his audience.

Visual designs aside, mark also makes use of other points as well. He has only one main idea on each slide, his text is only ever used for emphasis, and when he does use images, they are to illustrate his point more clearly to the viewer. Above all, the presentation is entirely comprehensive without mark having to lecture us.  I don't know about y'all, but I could think of a few lecture-heavy professors who could take some design tips from Mark.



**Addendum**

To experiment with CRAP myself (pun not intended). I created a single slidecast from some research I used in one of my previous school projects, a white paper on how nonprofits use social media.


Both the text and image are aligned to the center. The color of the text and background are in contrast with one another, with the background being a very pale blue. The background also matches with the blue in the image. Lastly, all aspects of this design repeat and are in close proximity with each other. I use the same fonts and colors to portray a crisp presentation. It's by no means perfect, but I would definitely consider it a start. 

**fair use edit** to my my knowledge, the image I used in no way violates copyright. While it is an image used by an academic party to explain better a piece of an academic research,  citing the author bellow should be enough to register my use of it for noncommercial educational purposes. I came to this conclusion by working through the 4 legal factors  of copyright. 
Firstly, my use for the above image is for educational purposes only. I in no way profit financially for using this image. Secondly, while I use creative aspects to get my point across, it is still a piece of a fact based slidecast Third, I used far less of the original work then the typically accepted "10%" of legal use. Lastly, There is no way for me to harm the market or competition of the authors. Given that this pot liekly wont see the outside of this classroom, there is no danger of encroaching on possible profits of the author.




Nest Realty Reasearch


Hello everyone, as part of my service learning project, I am here to present some of the research I’ve collected so far involving realty and social media. My initial question was very broad because I’m still not sold on exactly what the best facet of improvement could be for Nest Realty. Though I have a few ideas.



Right now, I want to focus on their competition. What social media outlets, strategies and/or exercises are other realty companies using to their advantage. For one thing, some realty companies seem to be making social media activity and know-how not simply a company endeavor but an employee one as well. On February 8, 2010, Prudential California Realty began a six month training and support program designed to assist agents leverage new social media (Business WireFeb). At the time these “new” channels were Twitter and Facebook, which have since grown to become some of the most well used social media apps to date. Focusing on the agents could allow Nest Realty to ensure their agents are familiar with the latest social media and that they gain effective strategies to engage their audience.



Nest currently utilizes two primary social media apps, Facebook and Instagram, where they have a fairly strong following. As I mentioned in a previous blog, Nests strategy so far has been to focus on the quality of their posts and their own ethos as opposed to the number of posts. They want to give off a friendly, old-fashioned vibe to their audience, and for the most part they do a pretty good job. However, their social spread seems a bit thin for a business. Many of my classmates feel as though Nest should spread out into twitter, which i is incredibly popular, though there is some concern with how well the twitter dynamic would fit with Nest’s current publicity practices. I myself have another suggestion: Pinterest



“Best-selling author and media training expert Susan Harrow understands this challenge and believes that out of the endless list of social media channels to explore; Pinterest should be at the top.” Pinterest is a “visual discovery tool,” popular among young adult and college age women, that allows users to search and “pin” images and ideas related to all their interests. It is very similar to Instagram and would fit well within Nest’s current Social Media appeal.  Pinterest is the ideal place to post pictures of houses and property and it has the potential to accommodate a lot popularity with it’s hashtag #lovewhereyoulive. Given that Nest is a realty company I feel they couldn’t go wrong with experimenting with Pinterest.







Works Cited

"Prudential California Realty Launches Six-Month Agent Social Media Training and Support Program." Business WireFeb 08 2010. ProQuest. Web. 24 Oct. 2015



"The Power of Pinterest: 5 Tips on how to use Pinterest for Your Small Business." PR NewswireJan 21 2015. ProQuest. Web. 24 Oct. 2015

Thursday, October 22, 2015

All about Nest Reality

Companies today go through great lengths to seem "hip" for their audiences. It is very important from a marketing perspective. The better you appeal to others the more likely your audience is to seek your business. Nest Reality is one such business that strives to stay afloat on the shifting sea of trends.
They are a Real estate brokerage company here in Wilmington, North Carolina who have done a fairly good job of building a positive online presence.

Nest Reality tries to set itself apart from other real estate companies by holding on a charming old-fashioned integrity in a business world that seems increasingly cut-throat. The seek to appeal lighthearted and trustworthy to their audience and in their philosophy towards the reality business. Transparency and the feeling of starting a relationship are qualities they seek to provide for their clients.

Ryan Creclius, whom himself works for Nest Realty had this to say in an interview. "It's a high tech world we live in, but at the end of the day, shaking hands at the end of the real estate transaction's very important."
A few of the many Nest Realty agents, each with their own bios.

The beginning to the Nest Realty Agents page.

What Nest seeks above all else is to appear credible to their clients, and not just credible as a successful brokerage, but as a fun and honest company. So far, in my analysis they seem to be doing a fair job of that. Their website http://www.nestrealty.com/wilmington/ projects an approachable  credibility. It is very simple with crisp clean colors. They feature detailed bios about all their agents humanizing them to make their company seem more approachable.

From the analysis I've gathered so far, Nest Realty seems to be doing okay in the appeal department. With my experience It will be challenging to find anything worth improving. Though I'm sure nest will be open to whatever I can find.

Thursday, September 24, 2015

Research Blog for BBWC and Small Nonprofit Rhetorical Strategy.


About two weeks ago I attended a film seminar held by the Building a Better Wilmington Campaign (BBWC), which is a nonprofit organization focused on encouraging students and their ilk to volunteer here in Wilmington in order to foster a sense of community. I thought that they would be a great topic considering my interest in their cause; after all, I have always been one to value the importance of community in… well… communities. It’s very easy to forget in our increasingly globalized internet world that there’s also a world right out our front door that has its own problems. So in an effort to lend a hand to those who are busy lending hands, I’ve decided to research the most effective rhetorical techniques for small nonprofit organizations. With any luck I might be able to find some useful Rhetorical techniques the BBWC can use.


First off, I was going to start off by analyze the rhetoric used in the BBWC’s website. Unfortunately the BBWC, doesn’t have its own website, at least not one that I could locate. They do however have a Facebook page and a volunteer page on the main UNCW website. Here they have links and tabs devoted to the specific aspects of their organization. Such as their head organizer Dr. Jeffrey L. Brudney, the inaugural holder of the Betty and Dan Cameron Family Distinguished Professorship of Innovation in the Nonprofit Sector at UNCW. He is also the Editor in chief of Nonprofit and Volunteer Sector Quarterly, “the premiere journal in nonprofit studies worldwide” (BBWC). The fact that their leader is so experienced and respected In his field no doubt adds a great deal of credibility to their campaign. In addition to general information they present, they also have tabs for things you’d expect from a program such as this, such as information on how to volunteer with them. One draw back to their lack of a webpage would no doubt be that their design opportunities are limited to pictures and logos along with the already uniform UNCW theme.  What they do have they display well however, such as their volunteering resources page which displays strong images of volunteering in America along with statistics. At first, I thought their lack of a website might be detrimental to their cause, but it actually might be a smart move. Because all their information is located on a site with a decent amount of traffic it saves them a little time trying to build their own audience. I’ll have to look more into this.


Chao Guo and Gregory Saxon in their article for the Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly Journal did a study around social media based advocacy and the steps a nonprofit would take to attract and get results from an audience. Here they narrowed the steps of advocacy down to three, for which they made a pyramid diagram. The three steps were reaching out to people, keeping the flame alive and stepping up to action( Guo, Saxon 70). For good measure, here is the diagram:


(Guo, Saxon 70)





 
(Guo, Saxon 70)
According to Guo and Saxon, These are the minimum number of steps, or “stages,” an organization uses to mold their rhetoric. Though I’m sure this isn’t the only way to go about making a marketing strategy. It’s also very vague. I imagine that when coupled with specific examples from my readings such as social proof an organization might actually be able to effective marketing strategy.


The next source I found really interesting was Funding Source, Board Involvement Techniques, and Financial Vulnerability in Nonprofit Organizations by Matthew M. Hodge and Ronald F. Piccolo. In this excerpt the authors focus on the vulnerability of resources for nonprofit organizations. Because the funding they receive is typically from donations instead of revenue from sales, nonprofits are often at the mercy of the laws that regulate their nonprofit status. To cope with these problems, many nonprofits use something called resource dependence theory. A relatively simple practice, “resource dependence theory explains how an organizations survival and strategy depends on its relationship with foreign institutions” (Hodge, Piccolo 172). At its simplest form, it could be said resources affect a company’s plan of action. It seems rather obvious, but when you consider much of nonprofit resources stem from private contributions and government grants it becomes easier to see how these external factors might be of significant importance to a nonprofit. 

 
Works cited

"Building a Better Wilmington Campaign." Campaign Leadership: BBWC: UNCW. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Sept. 2015.



Guo, Chao, and Gregory D. Saxton. "Tweeting Social Change: How Social Media are Changing Nonprofit Advocacy." Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 43.1 (2014): 57. ProQuest. Web. 24 Sep. 2015



Hodge, Matthew M., and Ronald F. Piccolo. "Funding Source, Board Involvement Techniques, and Financial Vulnerability in Nonprofit Organizations: A Test of Resource Dependence." Nonprofit Management and Leadership 16.2 (2005): 171-90. ProQuest. Web. 24 Sep. 2015.

Wednesday, September 16, 2015

A look at Rhetoric In Facebook ads

 As a professional writing student, rhetoric is a good chuck of what I study, and it's no surprise. Our world is more connected now than it's ever been, and as consequence, we are bombarded with rhetoric everyday. Many times we aren't even aware of it. Social media for example has come to feature a smorgasbord of ads, the majority of which go unappreciated. Because, the average social media user has become rather numb to advertisements, companies have been forced to use every trick in the book to try and persuade us. Sometimes its pays off, other times, not so much. 
 Think of how many ad's you ignore in a day. Probably a lot. Now think of the few that you look at for more then millisecond. What is it about those ads that caught your eye?  

Barbara Shwon and Lisa Snyder, the authors of my business writing textbook, have this to say about the art of persuasion “To be persuasive, a message must do more than just state your point of view. It must motivate your audience to agree with you”(Shwon, Snyder). Below, I've located two advertisements from my Facebook feed. One message will show a decent level of persuasion, the other message will attempt to do so, but mostly fail. Chiefly, I’d like to point out the importance of language and word usage in advertisements such as these. It's not enough that they state why you should listen to them, they must also convince you that they are worth listening to. As is most things involving rhetoric, it's less about what they say and more about how they say it.



Cirque Italia: Negative Message
The following is a post I found on Facebook advertising an Italian circus that is coming to the Wilmington NC International Airport from September 25th to the 27th. This is an example of an advertisement that fails to live up to its potential. Let's explore why that is.
Typically, there is good and bad rhetoric in most advertisements, though some have more then others. to be fair let's start by pointing out what they do right.
From my point of view, the post makes use of the rhetorical principle of pathos(an appeal to emotion) more so than other methods of rhetoric. The writer uses exciting language, visuals and descriptions in an attempt to stimulate positive emotion and make the reader interested in their circus. Examples of this include the phrase, “Isn’t that crazy?,” and words such as “ Wonders” and “magic.”  language such as this serves to stir up positive feelings and reflect the exciting nature of the Cirque Italia. They clearly want to come off as not your average circus, and they don't do a terrible job of that. 
They also make good use of the principle of Ethos (an appeal using credibility), repeatedly citing their status as an Italian Circus, which they claim can, “Take you far, far away to the wonders of Italy and the magic of an immersion into its culture”(Cirque Italia). By playing up their Italian heritage, they further attempt to distance themselves from other circuses by coming off as exotic and sophisticated.
So, Where did they go wrong? You see, the picture featured above displays the short version of the message. The full version is about three pages long. Here is a link to it should you be interested:https://www.facebook.com/cirque.italia?fref=ts
 While they do a decent job with using these particular branches of rhetoric, they don’t do so well keeping it concise. The short version does a good job of catching your attention. But that interesting rhetoric is drowned in the full post, which drags on about their history, their founder, italian heritage and who knows what else. The information given in the long version of this post would be better served in an “About us” portion of their company website. They don’t have to explain everything about themselves in an absurdly long post in order to get people interested in their circus, and if they do, they obviously aren’t a good circus. In fact, due to the long, almost needy nature of this post, some viewers might actually get a negative view of Cirque Italia. If I were them, I would definitely cut out everything not directly related to the event they are having September 26th. They should focus on what would attract people to that event and not much else.
In short, I think they go a little overboard explaining all the things that make their circus great, at least in the long version. They should have figured out how to say more with less and saved themselves the risk of overwhelming their audience.

























Positive Message
This next advertisement I’ve found, is much more polished. It’s for a company called “Loot Crate” Which is a mail subscription service that sends products and trinkets to its subscribers on a monthly basis.
According to their website, they “deliver the best in geek + gaming gear”(1). Which reveals they are marketed towards those with deep interests in cartoons and videogames or those who identify with geek culture.
This particular  advertisement displays what they call the mega crate, which is given away to only one random monthly subscriber every month. From a persuasive standpoint, this would relay the principle of scarcity, in which people are more attracted to things which are in limited supply. It also appears to resemble a form of sweepstakes, considering that there is only one mega crate given out each month to a service base of over 400,000 people (Loot Crate). In addition to scarcity and a feeling of gambling,it appears that they employ social proof using the sentence “See why Loot Crate is the highest rated subscription box!” By making this statement, they are asserting that they are the best at what they do, thus adding to their credibility
Much like the last advertisement, language plays a big role in constructing Loot Crate’s visual argument. By using words like “Epic, Mega and Loot,” they latch on the popular geek culture of their primary demographic. These words have been popularized among a youthful techie audience through video games and cartoons, and by using this language they can stand out among other advertisements which fail to raise the interest of young “geeks and gamers.”
Lastly, It is also likely that the above advertisement may be a bit misleading. For one thing, the prizes presented in the mega crate are not at all typical of the usual monthly crate, which usually amounts to nothing more but posters, books, and paperweights(Loot Crate). Someone seeing this advertisement might see all the expensive electronics and think they actually give out those products all the time. Furthermore, if you look closely by the picture of the car in the advertisement, you can see the words “Scale model Car.” Someone who didn’t pay attention to this fine print may sign-up believing that they stand a chance of winning an actual full-sized muscle car instead of a cheap plastic paperweight.
Overall, I feel their rhetoric is all in order. They manage to make a very simple,short, but effective message that could potentially attract potential subscribers. My only critique would be their apparent attempt to mislead their audience, which may be a breach of ethics. Other than that, I would say Loot Crate does an excellent job in this advertisement. 



Conclusion
So where does that leave us? Well, In comparing the post for Cirque Italia and the advertisement for Loot Crate, It appears the later manages to make a much more compelling and attractive visual argument by displaying a simple graphic and a few short sentences. Cirque Italia, on the other hand, attempted to say way too much with their post which hurt their overall presentation. Using these two posts as reference, I think the most important lesson we can learn from these two advertisements is that of concise language in advertising. To build an effective advertisement, the author(s) must make sure to tell the audience only what they need to know to in order to get them interested in what they have to offer. Boring them with excessive details and facts can be detrimental to a businesses ultimate goal of attracting a larger audience and selling more products or services.  



Works Cited


"Loot Crate - Monthly Geek and Gamer Subscription Box." Loot Crate. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Sept. 2015.


Cirque Italia. In Facebook [Business Page]. 10 Sept. , 2015. https://www.facebook.com/cirque.italia?fref=ts


Shwon, Barbara and Snyder, Lisa Gueldenzoph. Business Communication: Polishing Your Professional Presence. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. Pearson Education, Inc. 2014. Print.